Annotation by Mary Brown: A much-loved wise friend; Allan cherished her conservatism and questions.
It was very nice to get your letter, but really I didn't mean to put you to the trouble to write. That is the trouble with receiving letters; to be bon ton one has to answer. Now let me whisper in your ear, you need never feel called upon to write to me because you are always in my heart. An inhibition (physical) does not give an alibi for rest, but it is also (and primarily) also an opportunity for more intensive inner activity.
Not long ago you raised a question about India. I am sending you Diogenes Number 13 because it contains an article by Louis Renon which concretely answers your question.1 I agree with Toynbee basically2 but of course there are some differences of aspect; just as all tree leaves differ, so all human viewpoints must differ according to the character of the individual.
I am convinced that the Hindu caste system, more rigid even than ours, had its origin in the high fact of universality, that all men are members of one body. But, as the apostle says, all cells of the body differ in function. Unfortunately in their practical life the Hindus laid emphasis on this differentiation, leaving the basic principle to theory, what they call spirituality. This laid them open to the successive waves of invasion. In union there is strength. The cells must work together, and spirituality and actual life must go hand in hand. A house divided against itself cannot stand.
<< Letters to Tom Ginn | Letters to Margery Gumbel >> |